Data Quality & Testing

← Previous: Workflow Orchestration | Next: SQL for Data Engineering β†’

Introduction

In my data engineering journey, I learned the hard way that garbage in equals garbage out. No matter how sophisticated your pipelines are, if your data quality is poor, downstream analytics and ML models will produce unreliable results. I've seen production issues caused by unexpected null values, schema changes, and data driftβ€”all of which could have been caught with proper data quality testing.

This article covers data quality validation, testing frameworks, and strategies I've implemented in production environments to ensure data reliability.

Understanding Data Quality

The Six Dimensions of Data Quality

From my experience building data pipelines, I focus on these six dimensions:

  1. Accuracy: Does the data correctly represent reality?

  2. Completeness: Are all expected records present?

  3. Consistency: Does the data agree across systems?

  4. Timeliness: Is the data available when needed?

  5. Validity: Does the data conform to business rules?

  6. Uniqueness: Are there unwanted duplicates?

Common Data Quality Issues

Here are real issues I've encountered in production:

Great Expectations Framework

Great Expectations is the industry-standard framework I use for data validation. It allows you to define expectations (assertions) about your data and validate them automatically.

Setting Up Great Expectations

Defining Expectations

Here's how I define expectations for a users table:

Running Validations with Checkpoints

Data Profiling

Data profiling helps you understand your data's characteristics. I use pandas-profiling (now called ydata-profiling) for quick exploratory analysis:

Schema Validation

Schema validation ensures data conforms to expected structure. I use Pydantic for this:

Data Contracts

Data contracts define agreements between data producers and consumers. I implement them as versioned schemas with validation:

Testing Strategies for Data Pipelines

Unit Tests for Data Transformations

Integration Tests for Data Pipelines

Monitoring Data Quality in Production

Implementing Data Quality Metrics

Best Practices

From my production experience:

  1. Fail Fast: Validate data early in the pipeline. Don't process bad data.

  2. Automated Testing: Run data quality checks automatically in CI/CD.

  3. Data Contracts: Use contracts between teams to define expectations.

  4. Monitoring: Track quality metrics over time to detect degradation.

  5. Alerts: Set up alerts for critical quality issues (schema changes, missing data, etc.).

  6. Documentation: Document all expectations and business rules.

  7. Version Control: Version your expectation suites and contracts.

  8. Quarantine: Move invalid data to quarantine tables for investigation.

Key Takeaways

  • Data quality is critical: Invest time in validation and testing

  • Great Expectations: Industry-standard framework for data validation

  • Schema validation: Use Pydantic or similar for type safety

  • Data contracts: Define clear agreements between producers and consumers

  • Test pipelines: Unit test transformations, integration test end-to-end

  • Monitor in production: Track quality metrics and set up alerts

  • Fail fast: Catch issues early before they propagate

← Previous: Workflow Orchestration | Next: SQL for Data Engineering β†’

Last updated