Message Queues & Async Processing

← Back to System Design 101 | ← Previous: Database Design

Why Asynchronous Processing Matters

One of the most transformative architectural decisions I've made is moving from synchronous to asynchronous processing for non-critical operations. It dramatically improved system responsiveness, reliability, and scalability.

Message queues decouple services, enable async processing, and provide resilience when components fail. This article covers the patterns I've used in production.

Message Queue Fundamentals

When to Use Message Queues

Good use cases (from my experience):

  • Email/SMS notifications

  • Image/video processing

  • Report generation

  • Data synchronization between services

  • Event logging and analytics

  • Background job processing

Poor use cases:

  • Critical path operations that users wait for

  • Operations requiring immediate response

  • Simple request-response patterns

Key Concepts

RabbitMQ Patterns

RabbitMQ is my go-to for traditional message queuing.

Work Queue Pattern

Distribute tasks across multiple workers.

Pub/Sub Pattern

Multiple consumers receive the same message.

Apache Kafka

Kafka is my choice for high-throughput event streaming and building event-driven architectures.

Kafka Producer

Kafka Consumer

Kafka Consumer Groups

Multiple consumers in a group share the workload.

Event-Driven Architecture

Building systems around events enables loose coupling and scalability.

Event Sourcing Pattern

Saga Pattern

Manage distributed transactions across services.

Dead Letter Queues

Handle failed messages that can't be processed.

Real-World Architecture

Here's a production event-driven system I built:

Benefits achieved:

  • Handled 10,000+ events/second

  • 99.9% delivery reliability

  • Zero downtime deployments

  • Easy to add new consumers

  • Full event audit trail

Lessons Learned

What worked:

  1. Kafka for high-throughput event streaming

  2. RabbitMQ for traditional queuing with complex routing

  3. Always use dead letter queues

  4. Monitor queue depth and consumer lag

  5. Idempotent consumers (handle duplicate messages gracefully)

What didn't work:

  1. Synchronous processing for everything

  2. Not setting message TTL (queues filled up)

  3. Auto-acknowledge before processing (lost messages on failures)

  4. Shared queue for different priority tasks

  5. Not monitoring consumer lag

What's Next

Understanding async processing, let's explore API design patterns:


Navigation:

Last updated